Traction-Talk

Traction-Talk (https://www.tractiontalkforum.com/index.php)
-   Show Reports (https://www.tractiontalkforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Weeting (https://www.tractiontalkforum.com/showthread.php?t=7711)

YYS4BOB 19th July 2009 05:38 PM

Weeting
 
Visited yesterday and managed to stay dry. Good show with lots of action/movement from the steam boys. Shame about Sentinal 8827 being unable to attend. The Tiger looked very smart, unlike it's shirtless driver. Personally I don't think I'd drive an engine without a shirt for safety reasons.
However, some pictures of the day.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...Marina1886.jpg
Belting Burrell 1244 Marina to the stone crusher.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ll26931904.jpg
Burrell 2693 was still sheeted whe I left at 2.30.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...nought1907.jpg
Burrell 2948 Dreadnought was busy all day with the impressive threshing set.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...Mary1920-1.jpg
Burrell 3833 Queen Mary looks so fine in its working clothes

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...emarie1930.jpg
Burrell 4088 Rosemarie in picturesque setting in the woodsawing area.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...untess1908.jpg
Fowler 11421 The Countess with a pair of impressive traction wagons.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...eTiger1920.jpg
Fowler 15629 The Tiger positively gleams in the sun.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...iger1920-1.jpg
As above

That will do for now.

SDSPS 19th July 2009 05:57 PM

Any news on trouble in the beer tent Saturday night?

8_10 Brass Cleaner 19th July 2009 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YYS4BOB (Post 69455)
Personally I don't think I'd drive an engine without a shirt for safety reasons.

Personally I wouldn't have a problem with doing so. I also regualrly wear short sleeves on an engine.

I've seen comments regarding this on TT before. Stood on a traction engine, the boiler is beneath you, the bit most likely to burn and scald is the gauge glass. It is at shin height. For that reason I would not wear shorts, having burned my knee badly once sheeting an engine up after I had changed into shorts for a balmy evening.

Is this ''it is dangerous'' manure a railway thing?, where the crew are stood behind a boiler with the gague frames at arm and head height?.

SDSPS 19th July 2009 06:37 PM

Has Queen Mary had a larger dynamo fitted since removal from Vivs yard?

Stirling 19th July 2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8_10 Brass Cleaner (Post 69458)
Personally I wouldn't have a problem with doing so. I also regualrly wear short sleeves on an engine.

I've seen comments regarding this on TT before. Stood on a traction engine, the boiler is beneath you, the bit most likely to burn and scald is the gauge glass. It is at shin height. For that reason I would not wear shorts, having burned my knee badly once sheeting an engine up after I had changed into shorts for a balmy evening.

Is this ''it is dangerous'' manure a railway thing?, where the crew are stood behind a boiler with the gague frames at arm and head height?.

I think it's also about having some protection on your arms in order to be able to isolate a gauge glass - though of course this depends on how you go about doing it?
I always have a jacket handy to chuck over a broken glass to block some of the steam for this purpose.

Conversely, I've seen people on railway locomotive footplates stripped to the waste on hot days - totally useless if a glass went - they'd never get near it.

Lancashire Lad 19th July 2009 09:23 PM

By the looks of it yes, Queen Mary has been fitted with a bigger dynamo. The body is certainly a different one to the old one.

http://www.steamscenes.org.uk/tth/09/DSC_3758.jpg

To pinch one of David's photos from another thread.

Confirms its had a bigger dynamo fitted

mark lewis 19th July 2009 09:42 PM

Also different to this one
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r...31FUJI0247.jpg

Gjudge 19th July 2009 09:50 PM

did mr parretts new burrell turn up if so any picts

millsie 19th July 2009 10:26 PM

as regards to the above, not as far as i could see, and yes its now using Ex-mayors old dynamo, as its still blue with all its gold leaf. was a good 3 days and were off again next year

Vern 20th July 2009 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8_10 Brass Cleaner (Post 69458)
Personally I wouldn't have a problem with doing so. I also regualrly wear short sleeves on an engine.

I've seen comments regarding this on TT before. Stood on a traction engine, the boiler is beneath you, the bit most likely to burn and scald is the gauge glass. It is at shin height. For that reason I would not wear shorts, having burned my knee badly once sheeting an engine up after I had changed into shorts for a balmy evening.

Is this ''it is dangerous'' manure a railway thing?, where the crew are stood behind a boiler with the gague frames at arm and head height?.

It was me that commented previously. A railway thing if you like, but water at 150c and upwards flashing into steam and then vapourising won't just pick on your shins- honest. If you are supremely confident in the integrity of any restrictors and balls in the frames, then take the risk, but if not, please reconsider. A glass rarely gives notice of its intentions so it is a shock when it happens. So many accidents have happened as a knock on of the Driver nursing injuries, so not being able to attend to his duties. Remember, a protector often acts as a deflector, spreading the good news around the footplate and if you don't have backplates, the shards of glass get everywhere. Boring Vern.

8_10 Brass Cleaner 20th July 2009 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vern (Post 69518)
It was me that commented previously. A railway thing if you like, but water at 150c and upwards flashing into steam and then vapourising won't just pick on your shins- honest. If you are supremely confident in the integrity of any restrictors and balls in the frames, then take the risk, but if not, please reconsider. A glass rarely gives notice of its intentions so it is a shock when it happens. So many accidents have happened as a knock on of the Driver nursing injuries, so not being able to attend to his duties. Remember, a protector often acts as a deflector, spreading the good news around the footplate and if you don't have backplates, the shards of glass get everywhere. Boring Vern.

Good job I have a Klinger then Vern. PS seen one go in a Sentinel cab at 275yet?

Vern 20th July 2009 04:57 PM

You will not believe this, but guess what happened today... albeit only 255psi. We have a restrictor in the top and a ball at the bottom, but still a nice little bang. As for the rest of it, I won't argue with you, but I will generalise. Depending on the engine, pipes and their joints have been known to fail and blowbacks from the firehole are hardly rare and cotton affords at least some protection.My real concern is for those who use the same glass year after year and don't wear overalls- a combination odds on to conspire to disaster. The other thing is that engine sense comes from an aptitude that not everyone has. I have been teacher at both experience day and proffessional levels more times than I can remember and the candidates vary from great potential to hopeless.. Bearing in mind the only formal qualification for road steam is money, the passing on of best practice helps to protect us all. If you think I'm being a killjoy, I'm sorry and it certainly isn't my intention- I am actually capable of having a good time and do have an intermittent sense of humour. Vern.

weidner 20th July 2009 06:11 PM

Vern - What a way to start the holiday season !

Interesting to hear about the restrictor in the top fitting . Sounds a good idea . What have you got in the back of your protector , a grill ?

I used to have a pair of heavy melton trousers when I drove Mr. Shone's waggons . They looked , shall we say , period , but were good protection , and ended the season with a nice shine on them ( Melton is what donkey jackets are , or were , made from ) I was blacksmithing at the time , and so they kept the heat off my legs at work too .

Owners of Fowlers , and others with their gauge frames tucked away behind the third shaft , may be interested to hear that the modern BONETTI reflex fittings will fit in a much more restricted space than the Klinger pattern . A nice man at Chanter Biomed took one off the shelf and measured it when I rang him , and there will be plenty of room for one on my Fowler .

They don't look bad at all , and on a Fowler they cannot easily be seen anyhow , so they should not spoil your authenticity . You do not need to use the Bonetti gauge frame , just the bit that goes in place of the glass , as with the Klinger . They are also about £ 100 cheaper than the Klinger pattern .

Vern 20th July 2009 06:21 PM

Hi, I have a back plate, held on with a couple of brass screws- very useful and good at stopping flying glass. The restrictor is a small loose valve that seats if the glass breaks, again it's very helpful.

weidner 20th July 2009 06:25 PM

I have an example of what I think is the ultimate , a protector with a hinged back panel , with a white plate with diagonal slots , and a grill with about 10 to the inch mesh outside of that . That way a blowout can vent freely to the back , without any glass flying .

Vern 20th July 2009 07:19 PM

They are (wash my mouth out) standard on some companies railway locomotives and like you say- the ultimate.

steamboy 20th July 2009 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YYS4BOB (Post 69455)

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ll26931904.jpg
Burrell 2693 was still sheeted whe I left at 2.30.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...nought1907.jpg
Burrell 2948 Dreadnought was busy all day with the impressive threshing set.

the burrell 2693 was uncover in the afternoon and being filled with water.

as for the threashing set knackered would have been a better word to use.

as for 8827 see the discussion section.

glen

Notsur Rotcorp 20th July 2009 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steamboy (Post 69656)

as for the threashing set knackered would have been a better word to use.

glen

What makes you say that? Looks a good drum to me, produces a good sample and probably sees more use in a year than an awful lot of others, and long may it continue! Some of the other stuff is getting a bit tired perhaps but the main tackle always seems to do a good job.

Simplex 21st July 2009 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Notsur Rotcorp (Post 69665)
What makes you say that? Looks a good drum to me, produces a good sample and probably sees more use in a year than an awful lot of others, and long may it continue! Some of the other stuff is getting a bit tired perhaps but the main tackle always seems to do a good job.

................even the chaff cutter?

Notsur Rotcorp 21st July 2009 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simplex (Post 69680)
................even the chaff cutter?

I mean the threshing tackle that works with Dreadnought, rather than the ancilliary stuff.

Pandora's Firebox 21st July 2009 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vern (Post 69580)
You will not believe this, but guess what happened today... albeit only 255psi. We have a restrictor in the top and a ball at the bottom, but still a nice little bang. As for the rest of it, I won't argue with you, but I will generalise. Depending on the engine, pipes and their joints have been known to fail and blowbacks from the firehole are hardly rare and cotton affords at least some protection.My real concern is for those who use the same glass year after year and don't wear overalls- a combination odds on to conspire to disaster. The other thing is that engine sense comes from an aptitude that not everyone has. I have been teacher at both experience day and proffessional levels more times than I can remember and the candidates vary from great potential to hopeless.. Bearing in mind the only formal qualification for road steam is money, the passing on of best practice helps to protect us all. If you think I'm being a killjoy, I'm sorry and it certainly isn't my intention- I am actually capable of having a good time and do have an intermittent sense of humour. Vern.

Having met you in person on our quite regular trips to Whitby, I can honestly say you're certainly no bore or killjoy Vern, but when it comes to steam, you're probably the most genuinely knowledgeable and experienced member of TT!

Here's looking forward to November!

staddlestones 22nd July 2009 08:24 PM

5 Attachment(s)
Some pic's from the event. Apparantly, the driver of Lord Derby left the crane gear ingaged, so when reversing so it bent the supports holding the crane up. Oops :eek:

Ruston 22nd July 2009 09:40 PM

I think i wood fit some sort of interlock on the leavers to stop this happening .

weidner 22nd July 2009 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staddlestones (Post 69992)
Some pic's from the event. Apparantly, the driver of Lord Derby left the crane gear ingaged, so when reversing so it bent the supports holding the crane up. Oops :eek:

Ronald Clark did the same thing on ' Emperor ' at Woburn in 1960 . Tom Paisley was the owner , and was not amused .

Come to think of it , is this not the same crane gear , transferred from ' Emperor ' .

Lancashire Lad 22nd July 2009 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by weidner (Post 70021)
Ronald Clark did the same thing on ' Emperor ' at Woburn in 1960 . Tom Paisley was the owner , and was not amused .

Come to think of it , is this not the same crane gear , transferred from ' Emperor ' .

Yes.

steamboy 24th July 2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staddlestones (Post 69992)
Some pic's from the event. Apparantly, the driver of Lord Derby left the crane gear ingaged, so when reversing so it bent the supports holding the crane up. Oops :eek:

yes they did it was very entertaining to watch,just goes to show how much some people know about running engines.
i dont thing it bent anything it just wound up and over the pulley and crashed onto the deck.

my photos will be online soon fingers crossed the computer is still working by then.

glen

buggeroff 24th July 2009 08:53 PM

oops......

staddlestones 24th July 2009 09:08 PM

2 Attachment(s)
I think they done it twice because i saw them do it on the Saturday, without any damage, but i think they also did it on the Sunday, bending the supports. See pictures. Double oops :eek: !!!!

steamboy 24th July 2009 09:50 PM

dear o dear i wonder how long it will be before they bother repairing it???

glen

8_10 Brass Cleaner 24th July 2009 10:00 PM

Sounds like a lesson learnt by someone!

Just pick something heavy up with it. Soon straighten them.

Any pics of the Green Marshall roller in the background in the first bent pic?.

staddlestones 24th July 2009 10:13 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Here you go

YYS4BOB 24th July 2009 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8_10 Brass Cleaner (Post 70233)
Sounds like a lesson learnt by someone!

Just pick something heavy up with it. Soon straighten them.

Any pics of the Green Marshall roller in the background in the first bent pic?.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...l876181935.jpg
This one?

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...1935detail.jpg

Notsur Rotcorp 25th July 2009 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steamboy (Post 70228)
dear o dear i wonder how long it will be before they bother repairing it???

glen

How about you ring Mr. Parrott and ask him, rather than decrying his maintenance schedules on here?

foden test driver 25th July 2009 11:48 AM

Yes it is the Ex-mayors it is the one that use to be on the engine when vick had th engine it was fitted for the rally and tested on the wens before the rally by the drive belt from the craine engine in the barn to make sure it worked for the rally as the craine engine was the only engine I had in steam.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.